The Operation
Extraliminal time travel is the navigation of the temporal field outside its linear sampling. The body remains where the body is. Consciousness moves through the field directly, and what returns is information.
The science-fiction tradition installed a different picture under the same English words: the body of a traveler crossing the temporal axis as a vehicle crosses space, futures visited and pasts revised. The traditions catalogue no such operation. Extraliminal — beyond the limen, beyond the threshold of ordinary perception — names the distinction. The limen is the configuration into which the consensus rendering compresses experience. Operations within it are intraliminal. Operations that exceed it, that read the field’s structure rather than the surface sampling, are extraliminal.
The category is broader than precognition. Precognition is the perception of events before they occur in the perceiver’s local frame. Extraliminal navigation includes precognition. It also includes retrocognition, the perception of past configurations; simultaneous perception, in which past and future stand side by side as locations rather than tenses; bifurcation perception, the seeing of probable timelines as branching landscape; and the deepest mode the Tibetan tradition assigns to the Clear Light bardo, in which sequential time as a category dissolves and the rendering’s temporal sampling becomes visible from inside the dissolution. Each is a mode of the same capacity. Consciousness reads the field rather than the surface.
The Mechanism
If consciousness is primary and the experience of sequential time is a feature of the rendering, sequential time is one possible sampling of an underlying field that is not itself sequential. The block-universe interpretation of relativity already says this in the technical literature. The manifold contains all events at all times as a static four-dimensional structure, and the apparent flow of time is a feature of how a worldline samples the structure. Bohm’s implicate order extends the picture. The manifest world unfolds from a deeper structure where everything remains enfolded into everything else. Temporal separation is an artifact of unfolding. Events that appear sequential in the explicate order coexist simultaneously in the implicate.
The instrument is the human nervous system in a configuration that suppresses the normal compression of attention to the local present. The contemplative traditions developed the configuration as their technical core. The twentieth-century laboratory programs developed it as audio engineering and statistical protocol. Both arrive at the same claim. With the suppression in place, information the linear sampling has not yet rendered, or has already discarded, becomes accessible to the instrument. The information is not retrieved from a future or fetched back from a past. It is read from the field that contains both as enfolded configurations.
Bentov supplied the body-side mechanics. The cardiovascular standing wave produced by the heart-aorta complex, sustained at meditation depth, induces a body-wide oscillation at approximately 7–8 Hz, the band of the Schumann resonance. The brain’s neural activity entrains to the oscillation through micromechanical coupling, and at the resulting coherence the instrument enters resonant relation with the planetary field. The temporal compression of attention loosens. Information previously inaccessible registers in the local instrument. The convergence with Pribram’s holonomic brain theory and Bohm’s implicate order is the substantive part. Three independent programs — biophysics, neuroscience, theoretical physics — arrive at compatible accounts of how an instrument of sufficient coherence accesses a field whose structure is not sequential.
The Vocabulary
The traditions that took the field’s structure as an object of investigation developed precise vocabularies for the operation. The contemporary discussion suffers because the working English word time names only one of the categories the original vocabulary distinguished.
The Greek tradition divided the question across three terms. Chronos is sequential, measurable duration: the time of clocks, of biographical age, of the consensus sampling. Kairos is the qualitative right-moment, the point in the sequence at which a particular operation becomes possible, the moment the arrow finds the open gate. Aion is the unbounded standing-eternity within which both chronos and kairos take place — the field, not its sampling. The patristic Greek of the early Church preserved the threefold distinction and used it operationally. The Eastern liturgy opens with the deacon’s exclamation Kairos tou poiēsai tō Kyriō, naming the moment of the Liturgy as an intersection between chronos and the aion of the unbounded present. The collapse of all three terms into the modern English time is a vocabulary contraction with consequences. What cannot be named cannot be attended to.
The Sufi tradition developed an equally precise vocabulary. Waqt is the present moment as it is given to the operator, the now in its qualitative density, the moment to which the practitioner returns through muraqaba. The mature Sufi is ibn al-waqt, son of the moment, born new in each waqt. Dahr is the eternal duration that contains all waqts as its instances. Ibn ʿArabi described God as dahr, a single day without night-time or daytime, divided into many days by the properties of the Divine names and attributes. Mulla Sadra developed the metaphysics further with huduth dahri: origination not in zaman (sequential time) nor in sarmad (absolute eternity) but in dahr, the third category in which the eternal and the temporal are not sequentially related but ontologically nested.
The Vedic tradition uses kala for ordinary cyclic time and mahakala for the great time within which the cyclic returns occur. The yuga literature treats epochs as configurations of consciousness rather than as durations along a single axis. The Hebrew tradition distinguishes zeman (sequential time) from olam (the world-age, the unbounded extension within which zeman runs). The Christian patristic tradition added aevum, the mode of duration proper to angelic intelligences, neither sequential nor strictly eternal but participating in both. Aquinas elaborated the category in detail to give the medieval scholastic tradition a working vocabulary for the temporal mode of beings whose access to the field exceeds the human one.
Mircea Eliade recovered the vocabulary in a form the comparative-religion academy could read. The category Eliade developed under the name illud tempus — that time, the time-out-of-time, the primordial aion from which all subsequent ritual derives its efficacy — names what the older vocabulary distinguishes. The ritual that is properly performed does not commemorate the original event from sequential distance. It re-actualizes illud tempus by establishing local conditions under which the operator stands inside the original moment as a current configuration of the field. The ritual is not symbol. It is operational extraliminal time travel performed at the cultural scale.
The Initiatic Traditions
Every initiatic lineage that survived the cataclysm cycle preserved technical knowledge of the operation.
The yogic tradition catalogued the capacity directly. Patañjali’s Yoga Sutras enumerate, among the siddhis that arise from sustained samyama, atīta-anāgata-jñāna: knowledge of past and future, attained by samyama on the threefold transformation. The capacity is treated as a technical outcome rather than as a metaphysical claim, and the manuals of subsequent centuries elaborate the conditions under which it stabilizes. The post-Patañjali commentarial tradition is consistent. Extraliminal access is not unusual in advanced practice. It is a class of effect that follows from the configuration the practice produces, and the literature’s main concern is to warn the practitioner against treating the siddhis as the goal rather than as ordinary functioning of an instrument approaching its design specification.
The shamanic traditions describe the same operation in the vocabulary of journey and time-walking. The Siberian shaman’s drum, the entrainment device that opens the configuration, is called the horse on which the operator rides. The rides catalogued in the ethnographic record include explicit visits to past events to recover lost soul-fragments and to future events to read the trajectory the community is on. The Australian Aboriginal Dreamtime, tjukurpa in the Pitjantjatjara, names the originating temporal mode in which the ancestors performed the world-shaping acts and which remains accessible to the present operator through the right ceremonial configuration. The past and the present are nested in the same aion, and the ceremony is the operation by which the operator stands inside the originating moment.
The Sufi tradition developed muraqaba (vigilant presence) and dhikr (the disciplined repetition that suspends the discursive mind) as the methods by which waqt opens onto dahr. Ibn ʿArabi’s Futūhāt al-Makkiyya describes the trained operator’s perception of al-dahr as a single configuration in which all waqts coexist, and treats the prophetic capacity of the Quranic prophets as a function of their operational access to that configuration. Prophecy in the Islamic tradition is not metaphor for poetic insight. It is the technical claim that the prophet operates inside the configuration the contemplative literature catalogues.
The Christian tradition preserved the operation under the categories of prophecy, vision, and patristic theoria. The Apocalypse of John is a record of a sustained extraliminal operation: I was in the spirit on the Lord’s day, and heard behind me a great voice, as of a trumpet. The visionary’s report is structured as a perception of future events from a position outside the sequential frame. The Hesychast tradition of Mount Athos developed the Jesus Prayer as the discipline by which the operator enters the configuration in which such perception becomes possible, and the Philokalia catalogues the conditions under which the perception becomes reliable. The Iranian Islamic Sufi current that Corbin recovered for the twentieth-century academy preserved the most rigorous technical vocabulary: the mundus imaginalis, ʿālam al-mithāl, the intermediate world that is neither sensory nor strictly conceptual, in which the events the prophet perceives have ontological status and from which the temporal sampling of the consensus rendering is one derivation among several.
The oracular tradition of the Greek world ran the operation under institutional conditions. The Pythia at Delphi, the Sibyl at Cumae, the priestesses of Dodona were trained operators working under controlled environmental and pharmacological configurations: the pneuma rising from the chasm at Delphi, the geometric stillness of the Sibyl’s cave. The capacity they were trained to deploy was extraliminal perception of the temporal field on behalf of those who came to consult them. The political class of the Mediterranean world treated the institution as operational for nearly a millennium and consulted it before military and dynastic decisions whose consequences the institution’s continued patronage depended on. The political economy alone establishes that extraliminal perception was treated as a real capacity by serious people who had material reasons to test the claim against outcomes.
The Contemplative Phenomenology
The twentieth-century recovery of the operation under contemplative-laboratory conditions produced a phenomenology precise enough to compare across operators.
Monroe developed the most systematic taxonomy through three decades of out-of-body cartography at the Monroe Institute. The Focus level schema is a catalog of configurations along the extraliminal axis. Focus 12 is the first state in which perception extends beyond the sensory apparatus. Focus 15 is the configuration Monroe named no time. The sequential ordering of past, present, and future dissolves, and the contents of time become spatial, locations one moves between rather than positions one occupies in succession. Practitioners of the Gateway Process who reach Focus 15 report the same phenomenological content. The autobiographical past becomes a landscape one walks through. Future configurations become accessible as terrain. The perceiving consciousness is no longer carried along a stream but stands above the basin and surveys it.
Monroe’s Focus 21 is the bridging configuration to non-physical reality systems. Higher levels — Focus 27, the Park, a reception center for recently dead consciousness; Focus 34–35, the Gathering, vast assemblages of consciousness perceived as present at a moment Monroe’s operators identified as transitional; Focus 42–49, I-There, the cluster of all incarnations of a single consciousness accessible as a simultaneous configuration — extend the schema to consciousness configurations whose temporal mode the linear sampling has no category for. I-There is the operationally diagnostic case. The practitioner does not perceive past lives as memories of former selves carried forward into the current self. The practitioner perceives the cluster directly, in the same simultaneous mode in which Bohm’s implicate order contains the explicate.
The Tibetan tradition supplies a parallel phenomenology developed across more than a millennium of monastic practice. The bardo literature describes the configurations consciousness traverses between stable rendering frames. The bardo of dharmata is a configuration in which sequential time is dissolved entirely and the operator perceives the configuration of the field directly. The Bardo Thodol’s instructions for the dying are operational. Recognize this Clear Light as the nature of your own mind, the text instructs, and liberation is instantaneous. What is being recognized is the configuration in which the linear sampling stops constraining perception, and the recognition is the operation. An attendant trained in the configuration reads the instructions to a dying or recently dead operator and assists the recognition. The tradition treats this as a learnable skill, codifies the conditions under which the recognition stabilizes, and trains operators across decades.
The phenomenology converges across the contemplative literatures. The Christian mystical tradition’s eternal now (Eckhart’s nunc aeternitatis, Augustine’s analysis of time in Confessions XI), the Buddhist vivikta-dharma of timeless awareness, the Vedanta’s sākṣī (the witness consciousness for which past and future are equally direct objects), the Hesychast’s theoria: independent vocabularies developed across cultures with no contact, converging on a single phenomenological description of the configuration in which the temporal sampling is loosened. The convergence is the kind of evidence the consciousness-primary framework predicts. Independent operators using different cultural overlays arrive at structurally identical reports because the underlying territory is the same and the operational configuration that gives access to it is invariant under cultural translation.
The Laboratory Evidence
The twentieth-century laboratory programs investigated the same capacity under explicit experimental protocols.
The most extensive corpus is the remote viewing research begun at Stanford Research Institute under Russell Targ and Hal Puthoff and absorbed into the Stargate Program in the late 1970s. The program ran for two decades with sustained institutional investment exceeding twenty million dollars and produced a documented operational record that included explicitly time-displaced targets. Ingo Swann’s remote viewing of Jupiter in 1973, six years before Voyager 1 arrived to confirm that Jupiter has rings, is the most-cited single case. The precognitive aspect is structural. At the time Swann produced his report the rings had not been observed by any instrument and were not expected by mainstream planetary astronomy. The information existed in the configuration Swann was trained to access, and the linear sampling caught up later.
Joe McMoneagle, remote viewer no. 1, ran 450 missions across his Stargate tenure and accumulated a precognitive record that includes the launch date of a newly constructed Soviet submarine, predicted in advance and confirmed by satellite photo, and the release of a Middle Eastern hostage with correct description of the medical condition that precipitated the release, predicted three weeks before the hostage-takers reached the decision. The Stargate protocol of Coordinate Remote Viewing developed by Swann included explicit provisions for time-displaced targets, and the program’s internal evaluations rated precognitive viewing as comparable in accuracy to contemporaneous viewing. In some operators the precognitive frame produced slightly better results because the analytical interference was reduced. The program’s termination in the mid-1990s was driven by the political determination that operationally useful intelligence required higher accuracy than the protocols could reliably deliver, not by absence of effect. Jessica Utts, the statistician on the AIR review panel, concluded that the statistical results were far beyond what is expected by chance and that the size and consistency of the effect made it of interest both scientifically and practically. Ray Hyman, the panel’s psychologist, conceded the methodology was sound and that the effect could not be explained by chance, then declined to draw the consequence.
The Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research Lab produced the second major corpus across nearly three decades of operation under the direction of Dean Robert G. Jahn. The benchmark experiment ran 2.5 million trials of operator-influenced random event generators across twelve years and ninety-one operators, producing a Z-score of 3.99, odds against chance approximately 15,000 to 1. The result that bears on extraliminal time is a separate strand. PEAR ran experiments in which the operator’s intention was applied either before the random event generator produced its output or after the output had been recorded, with the operator unaware of when in the sequence their attention had been deployed. The effect persisted across both conditions. The data showed the relative insensitivity of anomalous effects to objective physical correlates, including distance and time. The operator’s attention was producing measurable shifts in the random event generator’s output regardless of whether the attention preceded or followed the output in linear time. The operator was not pushing causation backwards. The operator’s attention was reading the field in a mode that did not respect the linear sampling, and the registered effect was the field’s response to that reading.
Daryl Bem extended the PEAR-type design to the domain of perception and reaction time in Feeling the Future, published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Bem ran nine experiments in which standard psychological protocols were inverted in time. Subjects studied words after being tested on them; subjects responded to images that had not yet been selected. Bem reported small but statistically significant effects in eight of the nine. The methodological controversy that followed produced both the most aggressive replication-failure literature in the field and a meta-analysis aggregating ninety experiments from thirty-three laboratories in fourteen countries. The meta-analysis reported a combined effect size of 0.09 with a Z-score above 6, and an effect-size estimate from the independent replications, with Bem’s own studies excluded, of 0.06. The Kekecs preregistered replication returned null, and the literature remains methodologically contested. The contestation has concerned whether the effect exists at all, not what the effect would mean if it does. A measurable retrocausal effect at the scale Bem reports — a fraction of a percent above chance, present across cultures and laboratories — is structurally incompatible with the linear-time framework, and the framework’s defenders have understood that.
The theoretical context includes an active program in time-symmetric quantum mechanics whose technical literature is uncontroversial. The Wheeler–Feynman absorber theory, the two-state vector formalism of Aharonov, Bergmann, and Lebowitz, and the transactional interpretation of John Cramer all treat quantum events as products of advanced and retarded waves whose interaction is symmetric under time reversal. The Wheeler delayed-choice experiment, performed in increasingly refined versions across the 1980s and 1990s, confirms that the experimental configuration chosen at one moment determines the past behavior of a quantum system in ways that are formally indistinguishable from retrocausal influence. The mainstream interpretation has labored to deny the retrocausal reading by reinterpreting causation in ways the classical framework cannot accommodate. The persistence of the labor is itself information about how seriously the underlying physics is being taken.
The Programs
The institutional engagement is documented at the threshold programs. The temporal aspect bears specific attention. The McDonnell report — Wayne McDonnell’s Analysis and Assessment of Gateway Process, U.S. Army INSCOM — is the clearest declassified document on the institutional understanding of extraliminal time. McDonnell concludes that time as ordinarily experienced is a construct of waking consciousness, that the body operates as a tunable resonant system whose coupling to the planetary field through the cardiovascular standing wave is the mechanism of access to the substrate, and that the substrate itself is holographic, containing information at every point that the linear sampling distributes across space and time. The report draws on Bohm, Pribram, and Bentov by name and treats the convergence as load-bearing.
Page 25 of the McDonnell report remained redacted from publicly available versions for two decades after partial declassification. The page was eventually located in the Monroe Institute’s own archives. Its content addresses the Absolute, an infinite uniform energy field existing outside spacetime that the report identifies with the Holy Spirit of Christian theology, the Tree of Life of Hebrew mysticism, the Hindu cosmological substrate, and the quantum field of contemporary physics. The intelligence community produced, through classified analysis, a document whose conclusions are indistinguishable from the central thesis of the contemplative tradition. The redaction’s duration discloses the institutional estimate of the conclusion’s sensitivity. The framework that admits extraliminal time travel as a real capacity admits a great deal else, and the consensus rendering’s stability depends on the great deal else not being widely available as institutional fact.
Stargate’s classification of precognitive remote viewing as operationally equivalent to contemporaneous remote viewing — protocol-identical, accuracy-comparable — establishes the institutional finding directly. The intelligence community treated extraliminal time access as a working capacity for two decades and measured its outputs against the operational standards it applied to satellite imagery and signals intercepts. The program’s termination on grounds of inadequate accuracy was a decision about cost-effectiveness for tactical intelligence. What was abandoned was the expectation of using the capacity to replace conventional collection at scale. What was demonstrated was that the capacity exists in operators trained to it, that its outputs include information time-displaced from the moment of viewing, and that the accuracy under controlled conditions exceeds chance by margins the program’s own statisticians regarded as substantial.
The Operational Modes
Several distinguishable modes of the operation are catalogued in the literature, each with its own training requirements and characteristic limits.
Retrocognition is the perception of past configurations. The clearest contemporary corpus is the past-life memory research of Ian Stevenson, Jim Tucker, and the University of Virginia Division of Perceptual Studies, which catalogues several thousand cases of children producing verifiable information about the lives of deceased individuals to whom no ordinary information channel was available. The cases are the spontaneous form of retrocognition, occurring in young children whose linear sampling has not yet stabilized. The trained form runs through the contemplative literature under the categories of purvajatijñāna in the Yoga Sutras and the akashic-records literature of the Theosophical tradition, in which the operator reads a substrate-record of past events.
Precognition is the perception of future configurations. The PEAR retrocausal data, the Bem replication corpus, the Stargate precognitive viewing record, and the prophetic tradition across cultures all bear on this mode. The operational caution the literature emphasizes is that the future is not single. The precognitive perception is of probable configurations whose realization is contingent on the trajectory the present is on, and the operator’s perception of the probable configuration may itself be one of the inputs that shifts the trajectory. The prophetic tradition’s jonah problem — the prophecy of Nineveh’s destruction whose announcement produces the repentance that prevents the destruction — is the canonical statement of this difficulty. Precognition is information about a probability distribution over configurations, not a deterministic readout of a fixed future. The implications for what prophecy technically means are substantial.
Bifurcation perception is the more advanced form of precognition. The configuration the operator perceives is the entire branching of probable timelines from the present moment, treated as landscape rather than as a single line. The Hopi prophetic tradition, the I Ching as divination apparatus, the Mayan day-keeping calendars, and the operational use of astrology in the older traditions all assume the bifurcation mode. The current cycle’s bifurcation point — what the bifurcation catalogues — is a specific case the prophetic literature has been pointing at for several thousand years from inside this mode.
Synchronistic perception is the mode the Jung-Pauli framework formalized. Inner states and outer events are perceived as correlated through a non-causal channel that is structurally temporal. Events fall together in time without one causing the other. The operator who has stabilized this mode reads the synchronistic field as ongoing communication. The five-model account of guidance — nonlocal information access, retrocausation from the future-self, discrete symbiotic intelligence, substrate responsiveness, integrated combination — applies directly. Each model is a partial description of an extraliminal operation occurring in the operator’s local frame as the synchronistic stream.
Eternal-now perception is the deepest mode. Past and future are no longer distinguished as tenses, and sequential time is recognized as a feature of the rendering rather than as a property of consciousness. The Tibetan Clear Light, the Zen original face, the Sufi baqā billāh, the Christian unitive vision: independent reports of the configuration in which the temporal sampling has been seen through entirely. This mode is the substrate from which the other modes are derivations. The trained operator who stabilizes it does not perform retrocognition or precognition as separate operations. The configuration in which past and future are simultaneously available is the configuration in which the operator already operates, and the modal categories collapse.
The Device-Narrative
The popular imagination structures a substantial fraction of its temporal-anomaly mythology around the assumption that extraliminal time travel must take the form of a device. The assumption is misplaced. The instrument exists already. It is the human nervous system in a configuration of sufficient coherence. The device required is the practice that produces the configuration.
The most-cited modern case is Father Pellegrino Ernetti’s chronovisor. Ernetti, a Benedictine monk and musicologist holding the chair of prepoliphony at the Benedetto Marcello Conservatory in Venice, claimed in conversations with the journalist François Brune that he had collaborated with a team of twelve scientists, including Enrico Fermi and Wernher von Braun, to construct a device capable of viewing past events. The claim included an alleged photograph of the crucifixion, subsequently identified as a reproduction of a wooden carving from the Sanctuary of Merciful Love at Collevalenza. Ernetti maintained the substantive claim until his death. The documentary record discloses no further evidence of the device’s existence. Brune’s Le Nouveau Mystère du Vatican is the principal source.
Andrew Basiago’s Project Pegasus claims describe a putative DARPA time-travel program in which the claimant participated as a child in the late 1960s and early 1970s. The disclosure-adjacent literature carries the Project Looking Glass and Yellow Cube claims: rotating electromagnetic field arrays said to enable viewing of probable futures, an alleged extraterrestrial device said to do the same. The documentary record for these claims is the testimony of self-identified former participants. No physical evidence has surfaced. The claims persist because the cultural appetite for a temporal device is real, and the appetite is the diagnostic. The fascination with chronovisors and looking-glass apparatuses is the cultural displacement of the operational reality onto the technological imaginary, the same displacement that locates the gods in the sky after the temple culture has been forgotten. The persistence of the device narrative — and the cultural appetite it serves — is itself diagnostic. The demand for an engineered temporal apparatus mirrors the impulse behind the institutional programs. Both converge on the same underlying question about the instrument. The traditions that treated that question seriously concentrated their technical attention there.
The Suppression
The consensus rendering excludes the extraliminal operation because the operation breaks linear causation, and linear causation is the load-bearing assumption underneath the consensus historiography, the legal framework, the educational sequence, and the model of personal identity the rendering installs in the operator. If consciousness can read the field outside the linear sampling, the future is not closed and the past is not fixed. The historical record is not a deterministic substrate but a probability distribution over configurations whose collapse depends in part on the operator’s relation to the field. The prophet, the seer, the practiced operator is reading something the consensus framework has no category for. The trajectories the consensus historiography treats as inevitable are one branch of a bifurcation whose alternative branches remain accessible to perception even where they remain inaccessible to material realization.
The institutional response has been consistent across the disciplinary boundaries. The physics literature interprets the time-symmetric formulations of quantum mechanics as mathematical convenience. The psychology literature reads the precognitive effects in the Bem corpus as statistical artifacts. The intelligence community classified its own working programs under the highest available restrictions and terminated public access when the conclusions of the analysis became sufficiently structural. The academic study of the contemplative traditions focuses on cultural and symbolic dimensions and avoids the question of whether the operations the practices describe actually occur. The aggregate pattern is the lock’s component at the temporal layer. The McDonnell report’s classification status is a reasonable proxy for how seriously the institutional apparatus takes the underlying capacity.
The convergence of independent reports — across traditions, centuries, and methodological frameworks — constitutes a body of evidence the suppression pattern has managed rather than addressed. The institutional response to Stargate, PEAR, and the contemplative literature follows the same form: acknowledge the methodology, contest the interpretation, and avoid the consequence. No public account explains why operators using incompatible cultural vocabularies and separated by centuries of independent development produce structurally identical phenomenological descriptions of the same configuration. The absence of such an account is part of the record.
References
Aharonov, Y., Bergmann, P. G., and Lebowitz, J. L. “Time Symmetry in the Quantum Process of Measurement.” Physical Review, 1964.
Bem, Daryl J. “Feeling the Future: Experimental Evidence for Anomalous Retroactive Influences on Cognition and Affect.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2011.
Bem, Daryl, Tressoldi, Patrizio, Rabeyron, Thomas, and Duggan, Michael. “Feeling the Future: A Meta-Analysis of 90 Experiments on the Anomalous Anticipation of Random Future Events.” F1000Research, 2016.
Bentov, Itzhak. Stalking the Wild Pendulum: On the Mechanics of Consciousness. Dutton, 1977.
Bohm, David. Wholeness and the Implicate Order. Routledge, 1980.
Brune, François. Le Nouveau Mystère du Vatican. Albin Michel, 2002.
Corbin, Henry. Cyclical Time and Ismaili Gnosis. Kegan Paul International, 1983.
Corbin, Henry. Mundus Imaginalis, or The Imaginary and the Imaginal. Spring Publications, 1976.
Cramer, John G. “The Transactional Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics.” Reviews of Modern Physics, 1986.
Eliade, Mircea. The Myth of the Eternal Return: Cosmos and History. Princeton University Press, 1949.
Eliade, Mircea. The Sacred and the Profane: The Nature of Religion. Harcourt, Brace & World, 1959.
Ibn ʿArabi. al-Futūhāt al-Makkiyya. Partial English translations in William Chittick, The Sufi Path of Knowledge, SUNY Press, 1989.
Jahn, Robert G. and Dunne, Brenda J. Margins of Reality: The Role of Consciousness in the Physical World. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1987.
Jahn, Robert G. and Dunne, Brenda J. “The PEAR Proposition.” Journal of Scientific Exploration, 2005.
Jung, C. G. Synchronicity: An Acausal Connecting Principle. Princeton University Press, 1960.
Kekecs, Z., et al. “Raising the Value of Research Studies in Psychological Science by Increasing the Credibility of Research Reports: The Transparent Psi Project.” Royal Society Open Science, 2023.
McDonnell, Wayne M. Analysis and Assessment of Gateway Process. U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command, 1983.
McMoneagle, Joseph. Mind Trek: Exploring Consciousness, Time, and Space Through Remote Viewing. Hampton Roads, 1993.
McMoneagle, Joseph. Memoirs of a Psychic Spy: The Remarkable Life of U.S. Government Remote Viewer 001. Hampton Roads, 2006.
Monroe, Robert A. Far Journeys. Doubleday, 1985.
Monroe, Robert A. Ultimate Journey. Doubleday, 1994.
Mulla Sadra. al-Asfār al-Arbaʿa. Partial English translation by Latimah Parvin Peerwani, ICAS Press.
Patañjali. Yoga Sutras. Book III on the vibhūti discusses atīta-anāgata-jñāna.
Stevenson, Ian. Twenty Cases Suggestive of Reincarnation. University Press of Virginia, 1966.
Targ, Russell, and Puthoff, Harold. Mind-Reach: Scientists Look at Psychic Ability. Delacorte, 1977.
Tucker, Jim B. Life Before Life: Children’s Memories of Previous Lives. St. Martin’s Press, 2005.
Utts, Jessica. “An Assessment of the Evidence for Psychic Functioning.” Journal of Scientific Exploration, 1996.
Wheeler, John A. and Feynman, Richard P. “Interaction with the Absorber as the Mechanism of Radiation.” Reviews of Modern Physics, 1945.