NEW CHRONOLOGY

The "Issue with Mongols" is that this small nomadic tribe did not know until the XX century how great a power they supposedly once were. Nor did Mongols know who "Great Genghis Khan" was and how he allegedly conquered Eurasia.

The Mongolian Horde was merely the Russian army.

According to the official version of history, Russia remained under the political and military yoke of the Mongols for centuries. However, the modern interpretation of "Mongol" is of relatively recent origin. Mongolia didn't exist as an independent state until the early XX century.

The word "Mongol" simply meant "Great One", from Greek "Megalion." Its association with the nomadic tribes north of China is a later invention designed to justify the Romanovs' claims to the throne and demonize their longtime adversaries, the Horde, the professional Russian army fiercely loyal to the old dynasty.

The savage invaders we read about in textbooks were the protectors of the state in reality, and ethnic Slavs for the most part. Small wonder historians still cannot find a single trace of the mythical Mongol capital. No such capital ever existed anywhere near the Gobi Desert.

"The Issue with Great Tartary" is significant: according to the 1771 edition of the British Encyclopedia, Great or Russian Tartary was the biggest state in the world.

This enormous state disappeared without a trace from all subsequent editions of Britannica. Clerical mistake? Enigma clouded in mystery?

Moscow Tartary spanned the Urals, Siberia, Central Asia, the Far East, Alaska, and North America. The conflict between Moscow Tartary and Romanov Russia ended in the second half of the XVIII century with the famous "peasant war" against "Pugachev."

Only after the Romanovs' victory did European emigrants who had settled on the Atlantic seaboard of North America venture West. For decades they seized the North-American territories of Moscow Tartary left without governmental authority.

In 1776, straight after the defeat of "Pugachev", the United States of America emerged. The "War of Independence" was actually the struggle for parceling the vast American lands of the Russian Horde.

According to New Chronology research, Jesus Christ was born in 1152 and crucified in 1185 at Constantinople (Czar-Grad = Jerusalem = Troy).

Christ is identified with Byzantine Emperor Andronicus I Comnenus, known in Russian chronicles as Andrei Bogolyubsky ("Andrew the God-loving"). The Gospel narratives describe real events in XII-century Constantinople.

The Crusades were not Western European expeditions to liberate the Holy Land from Muslims. They were revenge campaigns launched from Russia-Horde against Constantinople following Christ's crucifixion.

This dating is supported by astronomical analysis of Gospel events, Egyptian zodiac decodings, and documentary cross-references that place evangelical events in the medieval period.

Fomenko's analysis concludes that the foundation of Rome in Italy dates to the XIV century A.D., not the traditional VIII century B.C.

"Ancient" Greece consisted of medieval Crusader settlements on Greek territory. The "Ancient" Greeks were medieval Europeans writing about their contemporary world.

The legendary Trojan War occurred in the XIII century as part of the revenge expeditions following Christ's crucifixion. Troy = Constantinople. The "Trojan refugees" including Aeneas migrated to Vladimir-Suzdal Russia, where they founded the Horde dynasty.

In Russian chronicles, Aeneas is reflected as the famous Ryurik, founder of the Rurikid dynasty. The Roman legend of Romulus and Remus reflects the rise of Russia-Horde in the XIII-XIV centuries.

The civilization of Ancient Egypt is irrefutably dated to the XII-XV century A.D. through analysis of Egyptian horoscopes carved in stone.

Fomenko was the first to systematically decipher and date all such horoscopes, coming up with medieval dates in every case.

The Pyramids of Giza were constructed between the XI-XV centuries as the royal cemetery of the "Mongolian" Empire. They represent Imperial burial practices, not the tombs of pharaohs from distant millennia.

Egyptian construction techniques, when properly analyzed, reveal medieval knowledge and engineering. The conventional dating relies on circular reasoning and assumptions built into the Scaligerian framework.

In the XVII-XVIII centuries, the victors of the Reformation wars systematically rewrote history to legitimize their rule and demonize the defeated Horde Empire.

Joseph Scaliger and Dionysius Petavius constructed the chronological framework still used today. This was not innocent scholarship; it was deliberate falsification serving political ends.

The Romanovs, having seized power through conspiracy, employed German historians to fabricate Russian history. Almost all founding members of the Russian Academy of Sciences in the XVIII century were foreigners who couldn't even speak Russian.

Original documents were destroyed, altered, or backdated. "Ancient" texts were forged in monasteries. The Scaligerian timeline was imposed globally through colonial power and academic gatekeeping.

Today's historians defend this framework not through evidence but through institutional inertia and career incentives. The New Chronology threatens the entire edifice of academic history.

The 1771 edition of the Encyclopædia Britannica describes Great Tartary as "the largest country in the world," stretching from the Urals across Siberia to the Pacific, and from the Arctic Ocean to the borders of China and India.

By the 1773 edition, this entry had been drastically reduced. By later editions, Great Tartary had essentially vanished from history.

What happened? According to New Chronology, the "Pugachev Rebellion" of 1773-1775 was not a peasant uprising but the final war against the Horde state. The Romanovs, allied with emerging American colonial interests, partitioned this vast territory.

The timing is telling: the United States declared independence in 1776, immediately after "Pugachev's" defeat. The westward expansion of American settlers was not into "empty wilderness" but into the depopulated territories of a defeated empire.

Old maps show cities across Siberia that no longer exist. Archaeological sites like Arkaim in the Urals, officially dated to the Bronze Age, may actually be remnants of this erased civilization.

General Suvorov, Russia's greatest military commander, was awarded his highest honors for the "Pugachev" campaign. Strange recognition for suppressing a mere peasant revolt.

Modern Mongolia did not exist as an independent state until 1911. Before that, Mongols had no knowledge of "Genghis Khan" or their supposed world conquest. These stories were introduced by Soviet historians in the 20th century.

The word "Mongol" derives from Greek "Megalion" meaning "Great." It was a title, not an ethnicity. Similarly, "Tartar" relates to the Greek "Tartarus" (the underworld) and Russian "Tartary" (a terrifying military force).

The Horde was the Russian army. "Khan" is a military title (compare to German "König"). The "Mongol invasion" was actually the military unification of Russia under a professional standing army: the Horde.

This explains why:

• No archaeological evidence of Mongol cities exists in Mongolia
• Russian and "Mongol" noble families intermarried freely
• "Mongol" administration used Russian and Arabic, not Mongolian
• The Horde's capital was never found near the Gobi Desert
• Russian churches thrived under "Mongol" rule

The "foreign invasion" narrative was invented by the Romanovs to delegitimize the previous dynasty and justify their own rule. German historians employed by the Romanovs transformed the Russian Horde into Asiatic barbarians.

The Trojan War was not a Bronze Age conflict over a kidnapped queen. It was a XIII century siege of Constantinople, revenge for the crucifixion of Christ (Andronicus) in 1185.

Troy = Constantinople = Jerusalem = Czar-Grad. These names all refer to the same city at different periods or in different linguistic traditions.

"Helen of Troy" is a reflection of the Virgin Mary, whose icons the Crusaders sought to recover. The "abduction" represents the religious schism following Christ's death.

The Trojan Horse may represent siege technology, naval vessels, or a metaphor for infiltration tactics used to breach the walls.

After Troy's fall, refugees fled in multiple directions:

• Aeneas traveled to Russia, where he appears in chronicles as Ryurik, founder of the Russian royal dynasty
• Other Trojans settled in Italy, founding what would later be called "Rome"
• The diaspora explains why "Trojan" ancestry was claimed by medieval European royal houses

Schliemann's "Troy" in Turkey is a minor settlement that cannot match Homer's descriptions. The real Troy, Constantinople, still stands, its walls matching the epic's geography.

Egyptian temples and tombs contain elaborate zodiacal ceilings, astronomical charts showing planetary positions at specific dates. Conventional Egyptology cannot decode these because they assume impossible ancient dates.

Fomenko's team developed astronomical software to test all possible dates for each zodiac. The results were consistent: every decipherable Egyptian zodiac dates to the medieval period (XI-XVI centuries A.D.).

Key findings:

• The Dendera Zodiac: dated to 1168 A.D. (not 50 B.C.)
• Zodiacs in the Valley of the Kings: XII-XV centuries
• The "Astronomical Ceiling" at Senenmut's tomb: medieval
• Athribis zodiacs: consistently post-1000 A.D.

The astronomical method is objective: planetary positions can be calculated precisely. Either the zodiacs show medieval skies, or the laws of celestial mechanics were different in antiquity.

Egyptologists have not refuted these calculations. They simply ignore them, as acceptance would collapse the entire framework of ancient history.

The Almagest, attributed to Claudius Ptolemy of Alexandria (allegedly II century A.D.), contains a catalogue of 1,022 stars with their positions. These positions change over time due to precession and proper motion.

By analyzing the systematic errors in star positions, astronomers can determine when observations were actually made. American astrophysicist Robert Newton (1970s) found that Ptolemy's data contained suspicious anomalies suggesting fraud.

Fomenko, Kalashnikov, and Nosovsky conducted a comprehensive statistical analysis. Their conclusion: the Almagest star catalogue was compiled between 600-1300 A.D., with the most likely date around the X-XI centuries.

The "ancient" Ptolemy was a medieval astronomer. His observations match medieval skies, not ancient ones.

This has profound implications:

• The foundation of "ancient" astronomy is medieval
• Texts attributed to antiquity were written much later
• The Scaligerian chronology loses its astronomical anchors

The research was published in peer-reviewed mathematical journals and as a book by CRC Press (USA). No astronomical refutation has been offered, only silence from historians.

The Romanov dynasty came to power in 1613 through a coup against the old Horde dynasty. To legitimize their rule, they needed to rewrite history, transforming the Horde from the legitimate Russian government into foreign "Mongol" invaders.

The systematic falsification began immediately:

• German historians (Miller, Bayer, Schlözer) were imported to write "Russian" history. They barely spoke Russian
• Mikhail Lomonosov, the Russian scientist who objected, saw his historical works suppressed and possibly altered
• Original chronicles were "edited," destroyed, or locked away
• The Radziwill Chronicle shows evidence of page insertions and alterations

The Romanovs destroyed genealogical records of noble families, replacing them with fabricated lineages. Cities were renamed. Maps were redrawn. The very alphabet was reformed to make old documents harder to read.

In the XVIII century, almost all active members of the Russian Academy of Sciences were foreigners. They had no loyalty to Russian historical memory and every incentive to please their Romanov patrons.

The "ancient Russian history" taught today is largely a Romanov fabrication, designed to make their usurpation appear as liberation from foreign rule.

The reign of "Ivan the Terrible" (1533-1584) contains irreconcilable contradictions. The wise reformer of the early reign and the mad tyrant of the Oprichnina seem like different people. According to New Chronology, they were.

Fomenko argues that "Ivan IV" is a composite of four different rulers:

• Ivan IV (the young reformer)
• Dmitry (possibly a regent or co-ruler)
• Ivan V (the "Terrible" period)
• Simeon Bekbulatovich (officially just a "ceremonial" tsar, but possibly more)

The Oprichnina, the terror apparatus, represented a struggle between rival factions, not the madness of one man. The "Story of Esther" in the Bible may actually describe events at Ivan's court, with Elena Voloshanka as Esther.

The Romanovs, who came to power after this period, had every reason to simplify and demonize the preceding era. A single "terrible" tyrant made a better contrast to their own "legitimate" rule than a complex dynastic struggle.

Original documents from this period are suspiciously scarce. What remains has passed through Romanov "editors."

The Battle of Kulikovo (1380) is celebrated as Russia's victory over the "Mongol" Golden Horde. But the traditional battlefield, a small field near the Don River, shows no archaeological evidence of a major battle.

New Chronology proposes that Kulikovo Field was located in Moscow itself, in the area now called Kulishki, near the Moskva River. This area has yielded mass graves and military artifacts.

The battle was not Russians vs. Mongols but a civil war within the Horde structure, between Dmitry Donskoy and Khan Mamai, both Russian-Horde commanders. Dmitry = Tokhtamysh (supposedly a different person who "sacked Moscow" two years later).

The victory established Moscow as the new capital, replacing the older Horde centers. The Donskoy Monastery in Moscow preserves the battle's memory at its actual location.

Old icons depicting the battle show both armies dressed identically because they were the same people. The "Mongol" vs. "Russian" framing was imposed later by Romanov historians.

The Biblical account of David vs. Goliath may be a reflection of this same battle, with Dmitry as David.

Andronicus I Comnenus, Byzantine Emperor from 1183-1185, matches the Gospel accounts of Jesus Christ in remarkable detail:

• Entered Constantinople triumphantly, acclaimed by crowds
• Drove money-changers and corrupt officials from power
• Beloved by common people, hated by elites
• Betrayed by close associates
• Subjected to torture and public execution
• His death involved suspension (crucifixion)
• Astronomical events accompanied his death

In Russian chronicles, this figure appears as Andrei Bogolyubsky ("Andrew the God-Loving"), Prince of Vladimir, also murdered in 1174 (dates vary due to calendar confusion).

The Gospels, in this reading, describe real events in XII-century Constantinople, not Palestine, not the I century. "Jerusalem" was Constantinople. "Galilee" was the Galatia region.

The Shroud of Turin may preserve Andronicus's image. The Crusades (1189 onwards) were revenge expeditions launched after his murder, explaining their timing and ferocity.

This identification is supported by over 100 parallels between Christ's biography and various medieval rulers who are all, according to New Chronology, reflections of the same historical figure.

The geography of the Bible doesn't match modern Israel. The "Promised Land" descriptions, the scale of kingdoms, the climate references: none fit Palestine well. They fit medieval Eurasia.

Jerusalem = Constantinople (also called Czar-Grad, Troy, Yoros). The Temple of Solomon = Hagia Sophia. The walls, the geography, the scale all match.

The Exodus describes the Ottoman conquest of the XV century, movement of peoples during the expansion of the Horde-Ataman empire. The "passage through the sea" may describe crossing frozen rivers, a common military tactic in Russian winter campaigns.

The conquest of Canaan under Joshua is the Horde-Ataman conquest of Europe and the Mediterranean. Biblical place names appear on medieval maps in unexpected locations.

Modern "Biblical archaeology" in Israel finds little that matches the grand narratives of Scripture. The great kingdoms of David and Solomon left almost no trace. But medieval Constantinople and the Horde Empire match the Biblical scale.

The localization of Biblical events to Palestine occurred in the XVI-XVII centuries as part of the general historical falsification. Pilgrimage sites were assigned to match the new narrative.

Shakespeare's "historical" plays are not fiction or ancient history; they encode recent events of the XII-XVI centuries that the author witnessed or learned from living memory.

Hamlet is a reflection of Christ (Andronicus) and John the Baptist. The Danish setting masks Byzantine/Russian events. The murder of Hamlet's father, the usurping uncle, the theme of revenge: all parallel the Gospel story.

King Lear = Ivan the Terrible, dividing his kingdom among successors with tragic results. The madness, the loyal/disloyal children, the political disintegration match Russian history.

Macbeth = King Herod, the Biblical infanticide reflected in Scottish guise.

Henry VIII encodes Ivan the Terrible's reign, including the multiple wives (Ivan had seven; Henry had six).

Shakespeare wrote in code because direct discussion of recent Imperial history was dangerous. The "ancient" or "foreign" settings provided plausible deniability while contemporary audiences recognized the real references.

This explains why Shakespeare's history feels so vivid: he was writing about events within cultural memory, not imagining distant ages.

"Genghis Khan" was not a Mongolian steppe nomad but Georgiy (George) Danilovich, a Russian prince, founder of the Horde Empire.

The name analysis:

• "Genghis" = variation of "Georgiy" / "George"
• "Khan" = military title (king/commander)
• "Temujin" = possibly "Tyumen" (a Russian city) or a title

Georgiy Danilovich and his brother Ivan Danilovich (= Batu Khan = Ivan Kalita) were the founders of the medieval Russian-Horde state. The "Mongol conquest" was their unification campaign.

In Roman mythology, this same figure appears as Romulus, founder of Rome. The "twins raised by a she-wolf" are Georgiy and Ivan; the "she-wolf" is the Volga River (or the Virgin Mary, in Christian overlay).

Georgiy is also reflected as St. George the Victory-Bearer, dragon-slayer, patron of soldiers, whose cult spread with the Empire.

The historical "Genghis Khan" never existed in Mongolia. The elaborate backstory was constructed later to explain the "Mongol" conquests after the true origin had been obscured.

America was not "discovered" by Columbus in 1492 as an unknown land. It was colonized by the Horde Empire in the XIV-XV centuries as part of the global expansion.

Noah's Ark = Columbus's Fleet. The Biblical flood narrative describes the Atlantic crossing. Noah = Columbus (or his prototype). The "New World" was the "Promised Land" of Biblical conquest narratives.

The Book of Mormon describes ancient peoples crossing the ocean to America. This may preserve genuine memory of medieval Horde colonization.

Cortés = Yermak. The conquistador who conquered Mexico is identified with the Cossack ataman who "conquered Siberia." Same campaign, same timeframe, different theatrical presentations for different audiences.

Pre-Columbian American civilizations show Eurasian influences: writing systems, architectural styles, religious symbols, metallurgy. These are not "independent inventions" but traces of Horde administration.

The "Native American genocide" was partly the destruction of Horde colonial populations after the Empire's fall, explaining why "Indians" were treated as enemies rather than simply as primitives to be converted.

Maps from the XVI century show American geography with suspicious accuracy, knowledge preserved from earlier Horde expeditions.

The Ottoman Empire was not a foreign Turkish invasion but an extension of Russia-Horde, the southern military administration of the same global empire.

"Ottoman" = "Ataman" = Cossack military commander. The sultans were atamans; their janissaries were Cossack troops; their administration paralleled Horde structures.

Evidence of unity:

• Russian tsars and Ottoman sultans used the same titles and regalia
• The double-headed eagle appeared on both Russian and Ottoman symbols
• Crescent moon and cross combined on Russian churches
• Arabic inscriptions on Russian weapons and coins
• Bilingual (Russian-Arabic) official documents
• Intermarriage between ruling families

The Ottoman "conquest" of Constantinople (1453) was an internal power transfer, not a foreign invasion. The city changed administrators but remained the Imperial center.

Only after the XVII century schism did Russia and Turkey become "hereditary enemies." The Romanovs needed to differentiate themselves from the old order; presenting Ottomans as foreign invaders served this purpose.

The "Turks" and "Russians" were the same people, divided by the Reformation and subsequent historical falsification.

Joseph Justus Scaliger (1540-1609) created the chronological framework still used today. His "De Emendatione Temporum" (1583) established the dates for ancient history that all subsequent historians have accepted.

Scaliger worked without scientific dating methods. He relied on:

• Textual interpretation of documents (many later proven forged)
• Astronomical calculations (now shown to contain errors)
• Theological assumptions about Biblical chronology
• Political motivations of his Protestant patrons

Dionysius Petavius (1583-1652), a Jesuit, refined Scaliger's system. Together they created "ancient" Egypt, Greece, Rome, Babylon, separating recent events by fictional millennia.

The motivation was political: the Reformation powers needed to delegitimize the old Imperial order. By pushing the "great civilizations" into the distant past, they made the current rulers appear as rightful heirs rather than usurpers.

Kepler himself expressed doubts: "Scaliger me seduxit" (Scaliger deceived me) and "Terret me studium chronologicum" (Chronological study terrifies me).

Once established, the Scaligerian chronology became self-reinforcing. All subsequent scholarship built upon it. Questioning it means questioning everything.

Using statistical analysis of reign lengths, Fomenko discovered that supposedly different ancient dynasties are mathematical duplicates of the same medieval rulers.

The method: compare sequences of reign lengths between dynasties. If two dynasties show statistically impossible similarity, they are likely the same dynasty recorded twice under different names.

Key duplicates identified:

• Roman emperors = Byzantine emperors = Holy Roman emperors = Russian tsars (shifted copies)
• The "ancient" Jewish kings = medieval European rulers
• Egyptian pharaohs = Horde khans
• Multiple "ancient" dynasties collapse into one medieval timeline

The Global Chronological Map visualizes these parallelisms. When aligned properly, "ancient" history disappears; it was always medieval history, copied and backdated.

Three major "shifts" created the illusion of deep antiquity:

• ~330 years (creating "late antiquity")
• ~1050 years (creating "early antiquity")
• ~1800 years (creating "deep antiquity")

Remove these artificial shifts, and documented history begins around the X century A.D., matching the "silence" before written records.

Ancient texts describe solar and lunar eclipses. Modern astronomy can calculate exactly when and where every eclipse was visible. This should anchor chronology firmly. Instead, it reveals massive problems.

The "ancient" eclipses described by Thucydides, Livy, and others often don't match their assigned dates. Historians explain away discrepancies as "scribal errors" or "different events."

When eclipses are dated without historical assumptions, they consistently fall in the medieval period:

• The eclipse at Christ's crucifixion: medieval dates only
• "Ancient" Greek eclipses: shift to medieval times
• Roman historical eclipses: inconsistent with traditional dates

American astrophysicist Robert Newton discovered that calculating lunar acceleration from "ancient" eclipse records produces physically impossible results: a mysterious "jump" around the X century that violates celestial mechanics.

Fomenko showed that using New Chronology dates, the anomaly disappears. The physics works when the chronology is corrected.

Eclipses don't lie. If the astronomical evidence contradicts the historical timeline, the timeline is wrong.

The "Pugachev Rebellion" (1773-1775) is officially a peasant uprising led by a Cossack pretender. But the scale, military sophistication, and aftermath suggest something far larger: the final war against the Horde state.

Yemelyan Pugachev claimed to be the legitimate Tsar Peter III (officially murdered in 1762). He commanded professional armies, controlled vast territories, established governance, minted coins, and maintained diplomatic relations.

The Romanovs deployed their best general, Suvorov, to defeat him. Suvorov received his highest honors for this campaign. Excessive recognition for crushing a mere peasant revolt.

After "Pugachev's" defeat:

• Entire cities were renamed or erased from maps
• The Volga River was renamed (previously "Ra")
• Mass deportations and executions occurred
• Records were systematically destroyed
• The USA declared independence (1776)
• Catherine "the Great" divided the conquered territories

The territory called "Moscow Tartary", spanning Siberia to Alaska, was partitioned between the Romanovs and the emerging United States. American "westward expansion" was the occupation of these leaderless lands.

"Pugachev" may have represented the legitimate Horde government, making the Romanovs the actual rebels.

The "ancient" history of China was largely compiled in the XVII-XVIII centuries by Jesuit missionaries. Before their arrival, Chinese historical records were fragmentary and contradictory.

The Jesuits:

• "Discovered" and translated ancient Chinese texts
• Established the chronological framework
• Identified dynasties with specific dates
• Connected Chinese history to the Scaligerian timeline

Suspiciously, "ancient" Chinese history parallels "ancient" European history: same pattern of rise and fall, similar dynasty lengths, matching "dark ages." This suggests copying, not coincidence.

The Manchu Qing dynasty (1644-1912) had connections to the Horde. After Moscow Tartary's fall, Horde refugees may have fled to Manchuria, where they were absorbed into the Qing system.

The "Piebald Horde" (Fomenko's term) describes the Manchu-Chinese state as a continuation of Horde structures under new management.

Modern Mongolia's "rediscovery" of Genghis Khan in the XX century was a Soviet project, creating national mythology where none had existed.

Chinese civilization is real; its "ancient" chronology is not.

The Great Wall of China, as it exists today, was largely built during the Ming Dynasty (1368-1644), not in deep antiquity. But whom was it defending against?

The official story claims protection against "northern barbarians." But the wall's loopholes (defensive openings) often face south, toward China, not away from it.

New Chronology interpretation: the Great Wall was built by the Horde administration to defend against Chinese expansion from the south, not to protect China from northern nomads.

The wall marks a political boundary within the Empire, between Horde territories and Chinese-administered zones. After the Horde's fall, the wall was reinterpreted as "Chinese defense against barbarians."

The "barbarians" were the Horde itself, later reframed as external enemies.

Much of what tourists see today dates to recent reconstruction. "Ancient" sections are often Ming-era at earliest. The image of a unified ancient wall is largely a XX-century creation for national pride and tourism.

The Greek hero Heracles (Hercules) is a mythologized reflection of Christ (Andronicus), with his story encoded in pagan imagery.

The parallels:

• Divine father, mortal mother
• Miraculous birth announcement
• Attempt to kill him as infant (cf. Herod's massacre)
• Twelve labors = aspects of Christ's ministry and passion
• Descent to the underworld
• Death through treachery (poisoned robe = crown of thorns?)
• Ascension to Olympus = resurrection and ascension

The "Twelve Labors" encode both Christ's mission and the Empire's conquests under his name. Heracles' travels map the spread of the Horde across the known world.

Greek mythology was not ancient; it was medieval literature encoding historical events in allegorical form. The "gods" were emperors and rulers; their "myths" were chronicles.

Other mythological Christ-reflections include:

• Dionysus (death and resurrection)
• Orpheus (descent to underworld)
• Osiris (Egyptian parallel)
• Perseus (divine parentage, monster-slaying)

Paganism and Christianity described the same events in different symbolic languages.

How were the pyramids built? Conventional Egyptology struggles to explain how "Bronze Age" workers moved and placed millions of multi-ton blocks with supposed primitive technology.

New Chronology answer: they were built in the medieval period with medieval technology, including concrete.

French materials scientist Joseph Davidovits (independently of Fomenko) demonstrated that pyramid blocks show characteristics of cast limestone concrete, not quarried stone:

• Air bubbles in the matrix
• Varying density within blocks
• Organic fibers embedded in stone
• Chemical composition matching geopolymer reactions

The "Philosopher's Stone" of alchemy may have been the recipe for this ancient concrete, the ability to "transmute"iteiteite into stone.

Medieval construction explains:

• The precision of pyramid construction
• The speed implied by historical accounts
• The lack of massive quarrying evidence
• The tool marks consistent with medieval rather than bronze-age implements

The pyramids were Imperial mausoleums of the Horde khans, explaining why "pharaonic" burials often seem looted or incomplete. They were used for medieval rulers, not ancient kings.